↓ Skip to main content

Parents as Agents of Change (PAC) in pediatric weight management: The protocol for the PAC randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parents as Agents of Change (PAC) in pediatric weight management: The protocol for the PAC randomized clinical trial
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoff D C Ball, Kathryn A Ambler, Rachel A Keaschuk, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Nicholas L Holt, John C Spence, Mary M Jetha, Arya M Sharma, Amanda S Newton

Abstract

There is an urgent need to develop and evaluate weight management interventions to address childhood obesity. Recent research suggests that interventions designed for parents exclusively, which have been named parents as agents of change (PAC) approaches, have yielded positive outcomes for managing pediatric obesity. To date, no research has combined a PAC intervention approach with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to examine whether these combined elements enhance intervention effectiveness. This paper describes the protocol our team is using to examine two PAC-based interventions for pediatric weight management. We hypothesize that children with obesity whose parents complete a CBT-based PAC intervention will achieve greater reductions in adiposity and improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors, lifestyle behaviours, and psychosocial outcomes than children whose parents complete a psycho-education-based PAC intervention (PEP).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 18%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 58 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 12%
Psychology 26 12%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Sports and Recreations 13 6%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 65 29%