You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
PDX models of human lung squamous cell carcinoma: consideration of factors in preclinical and co-clinical applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12967-020-02473-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hae-Yun Jung, Tae Ho Kim, Jong-Eun Lee, Hong Kwan Kim, Jong Ho Cho, Yong Soo Choi, Sumin Shin, Se-Hoon Lee, Hwanseok Rhee, Hee Kyung Lee, Hyun Jung Choi, Hye Yoon Jang, Seungjae Lee, Jung Hee Kang, Young Ae Choi, Sanghyuk Lee, Jinseon Lee, Yoon La Choi, Jhingook Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#18,739,545
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,014
of 4,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,893
of 398,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#81
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.