| Title |
How should community health workers in fragile contexts be supported: qualitative evidence from Sierra Leone, Liberia and Democratic Republic of Congo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12960-020-00494-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna Raven, Haja Wurie, Ayesha Idriss, Abdulai Jawo Bah, Amuda Baba, Gartee Nallo, Karsor K. Kollie, Laura Dean, Rosie Steege, Tim Martineau, Sally Theobald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 43% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 50% |
| Scientists | 9 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 45 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,833,162
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#172
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,966
of 426,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.