You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Who knew? The misleading specificity of “double-blind” and what to do about it
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-020-04607-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas A. Lang, Donna F. Stroup |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 32% |
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| Brazil | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Scientists | 9 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |