You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-7-49 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nina van Beek, Kristin Rentzsch, Christian Probst, Lars Komorowski, Michael Kasperkiewicz, Kai Fechner, Inga M Bloecker, Detlef Zillikens, Winfried Stöcker, Enno Schmidt |
Abstract |
Various antigen-specific immunoassays are available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. However, a spectrum of different tissue-based and monovalent antigen-specific assays is required to establish the diagnosis. BIOCHIP mosaics consisting of different antigen substrates allow polyvalent immunofluorescence (IF) tests and provide antibody profiles in a single incubation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 26% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,180,613
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#260
of 2,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,639
of 166,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.