You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
OncodriveFML: a general framework to identify coding and non-coding regions with cancer driver mutations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-0994-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loris Mularoni, Radhakrishnan Sabarinathan, Jordi Deu-Pons, Abel Gonzalez-Perez, Núria López-Bigas |
| Abstract |
Distinguishing the driver mutations from somatic mutations in a tumor genome is one of the major challenges of cancer research. This challenge is more acute and far from solved for non-coding mutations. Here we present OncodriveFML, a method designed to analyze the pattern of somatic mutations across tumors in both coding and non-coding genomic regions to identify signals of positive selection, and therefore, their involvement in tumorigenesis. We describe the method and illustrate its usefulness to identify protein-coding genes, promoters, untranslated regions, intronic splice regions, and lncRNAs-containing driver mutations in several malignancies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 13% |
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 27 | 68% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 102 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,344,124
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,051
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,074
of 353,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#17
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.