You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Proteomic analysis of synovial fluid from rheumatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12014-020-09292-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Svend Birkelund, Tue Bjerg Bennike, Kenneth Kastaniegaard, Mads Lausen, Thomas Bouet Guldbæk Poulsen, Tue Wenzel Kragstrup, Bent Winding Deleuran, Gunna Christiansen, Allan Stensballe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,494,289
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#149
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,983
of 398,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.