↓ Skip to main content

A methodological review of resilience measurement scales

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,976)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
22 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
987 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1956 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A methodological review of resilience measurement scales
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-9-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Windle, Kate M Bennett, Jane Noyes

Abstract

The evaluation of interventions and policies designed to promote resilience, and research to understand the determinants and associations, require reliable and valid measures to ensure data quality. This paper systematically reviews the psychometric rigour of resilience measurement scales developed for use in general and clinical populations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,956 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 <1%
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 1896 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 374 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 373 19%
Researcher 216 11%
Student > Bachelor 195 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 171 9%
Other 388 20%
Unknown 239 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 710 36%
Social Sciences 272 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 237 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 89 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 85 4%
Other 260 13%
Unknown 303 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#411,197
of 18,671,420 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#5
of 1,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,250
of 139,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,671,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,976 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them