↓ Skip to main content

Dating violence victimization across the teen years: Abuse frequency, number of abusive partners, and age at first occurrence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dating violence victimization across the teen years: Abuse frequency, number of abusive partners, and age at first occurrence
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-637
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy E Bonomi, Melissa L Anderson, Julianna Nemeth, Suzanne Bartle-Haring, Cynthia Buettner, Deborah Schipper

Abstract

Prior longitudinal studies have shown high cumulative dating violence exposure rates among U.S adolescents, with 36 percent of males and 44 percent to 88 percent of females experiencing victimization across adolescence/young adulthood. Despite promising information characterizing adolescents' dating violence experiences longitudinally, prior studies tended to concentrate on physical and sexual types of violence only, and did not report information on the number of times dating violence was experienced across multiple abusive partners. We used a method similar to the timeline follow-back interview to query adolescents about dating violence victimization from age 13 to 19-including dating violence types (physical, sexual, and psychological), frequency, age at first occurrence, and number of abusive partners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 9 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 42 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 34%
Social Sciences 28 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#1,247,809
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,345
of 15,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,278
of 168,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#18
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.