You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of hypertonic saline versus mannitol in patients with traumatic brain injury in prehospital, emergency department, and intensive care unit settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-020-00476-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yukari Miyoshi, Yutaka Kondo, Hidetaka Suzuki, Tatsuma Fukuda, Hideto Yasuda, Shoji Yokobori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
Japan | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 34 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 33 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,957,277
of 24,213,825 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#377
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,828
of 402,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.