↓ Skip to main content

Integrated Puncture Score: force–displacement weighted rind penetration tests improve stalk lodging resistance estimations in maize

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated Puncture Score: force–displacement weighted rind penetration tests improve stalk lodging resistance estimations in maize
Published in
Plant Methods, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13007-020-00654-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J. Stubbs, Christopher McMahan, Will Seegmiller, Douglas D. Cook, Daniel J. Robertson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,620,956
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#513
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,214
of 396,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#18
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.