↓ Skip to main content

Auxora versus standard of care for the treatment of severe or critical COVID-19 pneumonia: results from a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 6,096)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Auxora versus standard of care for the treatment of severe or critical COVID-19 pneumonia: results from a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Critical Care, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03220-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Miller, Charles Bruen, Michael Schnaus, Jeffrey Zhang, Sadia Ali, April Lind, Zachary Stoecker, Kenneth Stauderman, Sudarshan Hebbar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 60 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 66 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 329. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#85,160
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#24
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,031
of 397,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.