↓ Skip to main content

Herpetic esophagitis in immunocompentent host: cases report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Herpetic esophagitis in immunocompentent host: cases report
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12879-020-05328-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alba M. Diezma-Martín, Esther Gigante-Miravalles, Juan Diego Castro Limo, Carlos Andrés Quimbayo Arcila, Juan José Puche Paniagua

Abstract

Herpetic esophagitis (EH) usually affects those who are immunocompromised and is uncommon in immunocompetent patients. In these cases, EH may occasionally present as an acute and self-limited illness. Such cases are rare and only a few have beenreported and limited published reviews exist making the benefits of antiviral therapy in immunocompetent patients unknown. We report four cases of young patients who presented dysphagia, odynophagia and epigastric pain. Endoscopic findings revealed lesions in the distal esophagus and histopathological changes compatible with herpes virus infection confirmed by viral DNA in every case. After treatment, every patient showed significant improvement and tolerated oral intake after discharge. In this publication, we present four immunocompetent patients with EH, without relevant alterations in laboratory workup and with negative HIV status. This disease is infrequent in patients with such characteristics and there are few cases published. In order to better understand this pathology, we present the symptoms, the endoscopic alterations and the clinical evolution with treatment. In our series, 50% of patients had serology compatible with acute HVS type 1 infection, 25% had a subacute infection pattern (IgM and IgG positive antibodies) and in another 25% of patients, serology was not done. No patient presented leukocyte alterations, while all patients presented with anatomopathological findings compatible with acute herpetic esophagitis and responded to acyclovir therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,623,687
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,563
of 7,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,159
of 400,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#69
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.