↓ Skip to main content

Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies
Published in
Nutrition Journal, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12937-020-00604-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaojia Chen, Zhang, Huijie Yang, Peishan Qiu, Haizhou Wang, Fan Wang, Qiu Zhao, Jun Fang, Jiayan Nie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 69 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 74 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#378,375
of 19,218,475 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#118
of 1,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,504
of 309,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,218,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them