@K_Izdebski Grzybicy nie . Innych problemów poważnych - tak: https://t.co/vGy4d9EZLv
@KiminTheRealOne @RobbieSondaze @kosik_md autorytet leży i kwiczy od kiedy lekarze pozegnali sie z nauką a zajeli "nauką" medialną. Badania od 40 lat są: https://t.co/vGy4d9EZLv
@JaimeVelo @ed_ruthazer @districtai Only this is a theoretical-mechanistic study that has not been confirmed by studies from the real world. https://t.co/vGy4d9EZLv
@ilrisolutoreIT Un'altra misura supportata da dati scientifici. Considerando che, l'utilizzo delle mascherine è "utile" nel caso in cui "[..] the recommended minimum distance of 1.5 m is not feasible [..]". 👇 https://t.co/ceruRSmJFy
@BasienqaL @lukasz_kopczyk @MateuszWarkusz @K_Stanowski Really? W badaniach o maskach podał link do teoretycznych rozważań pomijając metaanalizy realnych badań i RTC czy badania z Real World Data, np: https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq htt
@szanti1995 @tvp_info Tylko szury i płaskoziemcy twierdzą że mają znaczenia - nauka stwierdza wręcz przeciwnie od 40 lat ponad: https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s63Ji87qMB https://t.co/WpJNj8JrW3
@Slawski @mwj53 @Krzysiekkulesza Te 8 to było dopuszczone z zastrzeżeniem że są bardzo wątpliwe jakościowo. W dodatku były to czysto teoretyczne modelowania. Realna nauka z real word data: https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s6
@mwj53 @Krzysiekkulesza Nauka tymczasem na podstawie realnych danych: https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s63Ji87qMB https://t.co/WpJNj8JrW3
@DziennikPL A badania ze świata na to: https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s63Ji87qMB https://t.co/WpJNj8JrW3
"Mascherine facciali: benefici e rischi durante l'emergenza COVID-19" 📊 Principali argomenti contro l'uso di una mascherina https://t.co/4JbnK8ZozH
@Paveu1103 @KONFEDERACJA_ @MZ_GOV_PL @a_niedzielski @Paveu1103 nie wstyd tobie byc płaskoziemcem i szurem? https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s63Ji87qMB https://t.co/WpJNj8JrW3
RT @wolvverinepld: @PolsatNewsPL Czy to ta analiza gdzie wzięto 72 badania, odrzucono 64, a 8 przyjęto z zasztrzeżeniem że mają one duże br…
RT @wolvverinepld: @mikolaj_kam @k_pyrc @k_pyrc A tymczasem realne badania , nie teoretyczne, nie odrzucone: https://t.co/mvira9ICOu htt…
@Kajtek13 @Bartlomiejjo @PolsatNewsPL https://t.co/NgSg19SjkQ stąd mój cytat, tutaj na końcu pisze to co pokazuje filmik https://t.co/SfVg5PCwbc Wszystko z pubmed.
@PolsatNewsPL Czy to ta analiza gdzie wzięto 72 badania, odrzucono 64, a 8 przyjęto z zasztrzeżeniem że mają one duże braki? W dodatku teoretyczne są? Tymczasem realne: https://t.co/mvira9ICOu https://t.co/kIrm4b0ThQ https://t.co/s63Ji7PPo1 https://t.c
@mikolaj_kam @k_pyrc @k_pyrc A tymczasem realne badania , nie teoretyczne, nie odrzucone: https://t.co/mvira9ICOu https://t.co/kIrm4b0ThQ https://t.co/s63Ji7PPo1 https://t.co/WpJNj912NB Udowadniają państwo że tutuły naukowe są warte tyle co paczka cz
@AgnieszkaSzust3 @PiotrWitczak_ Tymczasem dane z realnego świata: https://t.co/mvira9ICOu https://t.co/kIrm4b0ThQ https://t.co/s63Ji7PPo1 https://t.co/WpJNj912NB
@Zenobiu55006329 @slawekkomar @PawelWronskigw Lewica wspiera PiS np. w sprawie zamordyzmu całościowo. "olewanie obostrzeń związanych z pandemią" Zgodnie z badaniami - nigdzie obostrzenia nie miały znaczenia i wpływu na Covid-19 , za to spowodowały olbrzymi
@JM__212 @ben_roads @atalanta44 @DavidLeyonhjelm @PatsKarvelas Oh ok..go on then... https://t.co/2GO3peIz98
@GrzesioSzczupak @domi_dlugosz @Arlukowicz Pani @domi_dlugosz widać też nalezy do szurów i płaskoziemców, stroniących od Nauki. https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s63Ji87qMB https://t.co/WpJNj8JrW3
@domi_dlugosz I słusznie, szurstwo w sejmie przeraża i płaskoziemstwo Witek : https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s63Ji87qMB https://t.co/WpJNj8JrW3
@schmangee Masking is for idiots: https://t.co/mvira9ICOu https://t.co/kIrm4b0ThQ https://t.co/s63Ji7PPo1 https://t.co/WpJNj912NB
@slawomi89538746 @kryztiandk @Arlukowicz Tylko jak by to Tobie powiedzieć ;) https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s63Ji87qMB https://t.co/WpJNj8JrW3
@salsinarey @DanielMoralesJ @cuidado_secorta uno no dos y una carta a editor: https://t.co/xProtx63CI https://t.co/wEOBkLYwhV https://t.co/je9WS3fxpM (carta)
@NorthernLefty @IsntTony105 Sadly, there is no data to support your proposition. Have you notice how well people during TB outbreaks, are not required to wear masks? https://t.co/gMaL7q9RmW
@JohnLydiatt @NorthernLefty @IsntTony105 Sorry - but self-serving statements by policy enforcers are not robust academically sound studies https://t.co/gMaL7q9RmW
@NeilMonton @MayorofLondon @BBCLondonNews Yes. Plenty. Since last summer… Be good to your community. https://t.co/4O3udFDYKV 🧐 https://t.co/1fP1zrbNW7 🙄 https://t.co/gyWG9Qq9Cq
@LtJFK @LastGreatAct @CDCgov Did you not reed the peer reviewed evidence I sent you? Do you want me to send more? Take a look at those: https://t.co/A6cRufSbWk This: https://t.co/jPdMm1XBRx This: https://t.co/U8OFR09Eha This: https://t.co/1htlyQUf9I Th
RT @LindaAshton2: @FlWatchers @nathandickson @steven_dor @jordanbpeterson @elliemail @mikeaubrey2 @normanswan @MarkPlackett1 I already have…
@FlWatchers @nathandickson @steven_dor @jordanbpeterson @elliemail @mikeaubrey2 @normanswan @MarkPlackett1 I already have numerous scholarly links. Happy to share. • https://t.co/Y8OZOmup8G • https://t.co/IFLOAHfXEU • https://t.co/eHX9nVGUHZ • https://t.c
@MonsieurVone @JohnRambo_1984 @M96995136 Tu n'as regarder aucuns des liens qui ont été fournit. en voici deux https://t.co/Ixwfkb5PuR https://t.co/e1b4AB7peQ le deuxieme liens en contiens 70, tous rédigés avant juillet 2020 pathétique conspignorant https
@MonsieurVone @JohnRambo_1984 @M96995136 l'efficacité annoncé dans ton post es falacieuse. https://t.co/Ixwfkb5PuR voici quelques informations pertinentes que je fournit a nouveau. les consultés pourrais peuetre vous aider dans la prise de décision éclai
@AWangMPH @Westside4Bernie @VPrasadMDMPH It's too bad you believe in voodoo and not science. Read these 3 recent studies: https://t.co/mviraa0ed4 https://t.co/kIrm4biuGq https://t.co/s63Ji87qMB
@JustMeToo3 @adoRED19 @pocketdragon39 @indigobleu917 @osler78 @pedsscrub It's useful to go by what doctors say. https://t.co/Xwbcefwwmw
@NEORFX @SwiipixOff @LoralieGouget tiens plutôt que de véhiculer des bêtises https://t.co/9pzNhWdovf t’as 17 pages en anglais amuse toi bien y’a toutes les infos.
@provaxtexan @rolandmcs If masks are not exchanged regularly (or washed properly when made of cloth), pathogens can accumulate in the mask. When improperly used, the risk of spreading the pathogen—including SARS-CoV-2—might be critically increased. https:
@imACobabe "Upon our critical review of the available literature, we found only weak evidence for wearing a face mask as an efficient hygienic tool to prevent the spread of a viral infection. " https://t.co/evLRPLTLR4
@KevinARing Here is another research article that highlights both potential benefits and risks associated with facemasks. The article has not ben retracted. https://t.co/GhrVDKTsSN /6
@schraderism @RichmondWahoo Validated/replicated studies have demonstrated the efficacy of wearing masks: https://t.co/T6ID0uRl2B
@SteveB72574675 @WeWillBeFree82 Matuschek et al. Face masks: benefits and risks during the COVID-19 crisis. Eur J Med Res. 2020 Aug 12;25(1):32. https://t.co/FnVLTVRPi2
@DrHoenderkamp @talkRADIO @cristo_radio @trishgreenhalgh https://t.co/kvLFrGpfik This is another long one that agrees with much that you say but reluctantly seems in favour of masks where distancing is impossible.
RT @DrZemouri: •Mondkapjes bieden de drager geen bescherming tegen een infectie https://t.co/vp0BB1eo7c •Mondkapjes reduceren spat emissie…
RT @DrZemouri: #FFP masker moet testen doorlopen en verplicht aerosolen filteren onder optimale condities. Een FFP1 masker beschermt tegen…
•Mondkapjes bieden de drager geen bescherming tegen een infectie https://t.co/vp0BB1eo7c •Mondkapjes reduceren spat emissie itt tot geen gebruik https://t.co/LKN3lFpvRo •Een mondkapje draagt voor 5% bij aan de inperkingstrategie (modelstudie) https://t.co
#FFP masker moet testen doorlopen en verplicht aerosolen filteren onder optimale condities. Een FFP1 masker beschermt tegen 80% van #aerosolen, FFP-2 95% (ook bekend als het N95-masker) en FFP-3 99%.https://t.co/xA2m7JfnTc
@Turboshunt @ianmSC https://t.co/p5s1K85HBU says your linked study is wrong.
@richardkendall @alicevjones What’s happened? You were a great journo. You just quoted sources that are not scientific and just look at who funds them, seriously. 🤦🏻♂️ Here are some sources but also look up the UK Gov report when they thought face masks
The second is from an August 2020 review. It does not appear to support the claim that the evidence base is weak. https://t.co/kOzH3edGuj
RT @NikolovScience: An extensive 2020 query of the scientific literature about effectiveness of face masks in preventing viral infections f…
@ilrisolutoreIT Facciamo il punto sulle mascherine? https://t.co/tfsMZvE44X https://t.co/qtpu6WHoV3
@Stayathomemum6 Or this, which discusses both the risks and the benefits https://t.co/cUH0x3FyMl
@NFLFilmAnalysis @boorad70 @ZubyMusic Here is just one of the many studies so you can be engaged with the science instead of faith: https://t.co/Xwbcefwwmw
@Billpixes @phred_ace @Mrbelgium1 I didn't flout any law. I have given you evidence to prove that masks prevent transmission of respiratory infections, specifically SARS-CoV-2 ...and FYI, limited/some protection doesn't mean zero protection Read; https:
@Billpixes @phred_ace @Mrbelgium1 Another canine...can't make a point without barking. There are so many of you around these days. Thought you said you were an award wining scientist? 🤣 Firstly, Covid protocols ain't about masks only, but because you're f
@jblovatt But that sentence is admitting that there would be a small benefit. All medical studies I’ve read which warn of disadvantages of wearing face masks usually conclude there is a small benefit in wearing them. https://t.co/lS6YNNzn9M
@SAMsHowitzer @rose_k01 Yet another one showing they are useless https://t.co/Lm3evVQvdk
RT @fubarrdog: i think it’s weird that people totally ignore all the times “science” has said something was safe for humans, then turned ou…
RT @fubarrdog: i think it’s weird that people totally ignore all the times “science” has said something was safe for humans, then turned ou…
i think it’s weird that people totally ignore all the times “science” has said something was safe for humans, then turned out to be completely wrong asbestos, lead makeup, tobacco, lobotomies, mercury, radium...the list goes on
@hornyassdeer @ladymaelucy @BiodieselRacco1 @fubarrdog Sorry pal, but your poor science has been trumped by better science. It sounds like you just want every excuse to be selfish and entitled. https://t.co/JQwaHGA6KZ
@JovanDjordjev13 @SrbAnaliticar @ZajebaniZemunac https://t.co/Tc8T9RVwVK ево и други...
@GRandall0107 @Jordania213 @BBCNews Figure 1- If masks are not exchanged regularly (or washed properly when made of cloth), pathogens can accumulate in the mask. When improperly used, the risk of spreading the pathogen—including SARS-CoV-2—might be critica
@AwesomePawel @crazykarens I’m Icelandic, we have masks mandates and low transmission rates. https://t.co/DSUQ2qx2TB and https://t.co/IXmgYxne5y
@RaymondTommy8 @gibus_p Hop contre carte,ET + 4 J’espere que vous êtes bilingues les illuminés 😉, avec vos GROS cerveau qui vous permettent de voir ce complot d’ordre mondial vous devez bien comprendre l’anglais non? cadeau maintenant retournez dormir et r
@VictorC67993686 @MariaNordin Oikeesti?! No tuo eka on hyvä yleisesitys, sitten uudempia tutkimuksia: https://t.co/JsgeYHKwj3 https://t.co/faEdl09kBQ https://t.co/vI8fgux1w7 https://t.co/oiMxc64AWI https://t.co/gTuonWbISg Google Scholarista löytyy lisää
@lecterro @anita_fogler @SzymonSorokiew Te wszystkie kłamstwa antymaseczkowców łatwo obalić. Kolejne badanie: https://t.co/ODdjc0BDx0
Me quede preocupado por esa chica le pueden hacer llegar estos dos artículos científicos para que lea al menos michimi https://t.co/ElaHPE0DCq https://t.co/I6qEAOBdQr
@Ferodelga @Gus_Noriega Por favor @Ferodelga ilústrese y después opine. https://t.co/GWkQZIACDW
@mikefromohio13 @suc_real @GovMikeDeWine But masks were much more dangerous than they told us ...https://t.co/MQ1beM0vLE https://t.co/wnxElRJcWT