↓ Skip to main content

A dosimetric comparison of 3D conformal vs intensity modulated vs volumetric arc radiation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A dosimetric comparison of 3D conformal vs intensity modulated vs volumetric arc radiation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer
Published in
Radiation Oncology, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-7-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farshad Foroudi, Lesley Wilson, Mathias Bressel, Annette Haworth, Colin Hornby, Daniel Pham, Jim Cramb, Suki Gill, Keen Hun Tai, Tomas Kron

Abstract

To compare 3 Dimensional Conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for bladder cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 32%
Physics and Astronomy 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,407
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,929
of 164,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.