You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
European principles of inhibitor management in patients with haemophilia: implications of new treatment options
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-020-01511-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Hermans, P. L. F. Giangrande, B. O’Mahony, P. de Kleijn, M. Bedford, A. Batorova, J. Blatný, K. Jansone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 50% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,343,862
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#472
of 2,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,176
of 399,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.