You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Non-destructive identification of single hard seed via multispectral imaging analysis in six legume species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00659-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaowen Hu, Lingjie Yang, Zuxin Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 24% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,495,922
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#724
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,559
of 399,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#28
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.