↓ Skip to main content

Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the ENERGY-parent questionnaire on parenting practices, energy balance-related behaviours and their potential behavioural determinants: the ENERGY-proj…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the ENERGY-parent questionnaire on parenting practices, energy balance-related behaviours and their potential behavioural determinants: the ENERGY-project
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-434
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amika S Singh, Mai JM Chinapaw, Léonie Uijtdewilligen, Froydis N Vik, Wendy van Lippevelde, Juan M Fernández-Alvira, Sarolta Stomfai, Yannis Manios, Maria van der Sluijs, Caroline Terwee, Johannes Brug

Abstract

Insight in parental energy balance-related behaviours, their determinants and parenting practices are important to inform childhood obesity prevention. Therefore, reliable and valid tools to measure these variables in large-scale population research are needed. The objective of the current study was to examine the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the parent questionnaire used in the ENERGY-project, assessing parental energy balance-related behaviours, their determinants, and parenting practices among parents of 10-12 year old children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Psychology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2013.
All research outputs
#17,662,702
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,820
of 4,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,893
of 167,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#72
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.