| Title |
The importance of vitamin d metabolism as a potential prophylactic, immunoregulatory and neuroprotective treatment for COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-020-02488-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi Xu, David J. Baylink, Chien-Shing Chen, Mark E. Reeves, Jeffrey Xiao, Curtis Lacy, Eric Lau, Huynh Cao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 97 | 92% |
| Scientists | 5 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 561 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 561 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 9% |
| Researcher | 37 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 14% |
| Unknown | 259 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 55 | 10% |
| Unknown | 272 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#640,627
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#132
of 4,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,665
of 426,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#7
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.