You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the mental health of doctoral researchers: a mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01443-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cassie M. Hazell, Laura Chapman, Sophie F. Valeix, Paul Roberts, Jeremy E. Niven, Clio Berry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 17% |
| Japan | 8 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Mongolia | 1 | 1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 70% |
| Scientists | 17 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 74 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#536,104
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#61
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,905
of 426,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.