↓ Skip to main content

Successful ventilation of two animals with a single ventilator: individualized shared ventilator setup in an in vivo model

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Successful ventilation of two animals with a single ventilator: individualized shared ventilator setup in an in vivo model
Published in
Critical Care, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03248-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michiel Stiers, Tom Bleeser, Matthias Mergeay, Hannah Pinson, Luc Janssen, Tom Schepens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 69%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,966,302
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,225
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,966
of 424,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#100
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.