You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relative deprivation and mortality – a longitudinal study in a Swedish population of 4,7 million, 1990–2006
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-664 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica Åberg Yngwe, Naoki Kondo, Sara Hägg, Ichiro Kawachi |
| Abstract |
Relative deprivation has previously been discussed as a possible mechanism underlying the income-health relation. The idea is that income matters to the individual's health, over and above the increased command over resources, as the basis of social comparisons between a person and his or her reference group. The following study aimed to analyze the role of individual-level relative deprivation for all-cause mortality in the Swedish population. The Swedish context, characterized by relatively small income inequalities and promoting values as egalitarianism and equality, together with a large data material provide unique possibilities for analyzing the hypothesized mechanism. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 5 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Czechia | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,792,358
of 24,974,461 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,309
of 16,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,138
of 156,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#49
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,974,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.