You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide identification of genes regulating DNA methylation using genetic anchors for causal inference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-020-02114-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul J. Hop, René Luijk, Lucia Daxinger, Maarten van Iterson, Koen F. Dekkers, Rick Jansen, Bastiaan T. Heijmans, Peter A. C. ’t Hoen, Joyce van Meurs, Rick Jansen, Lude Franke, Dorret I. Boomsma, René Pool, Jenny van Dongen, Jouke J. Hottenga, Marleen M. J. van Greevenbroek, Coen D. A. Stehouwer, Carla J. H. van der Kallen, Casper G. Schalkwijk, Cisca Wijmenga, Sasha Zhernakova, Ettje F. Tigchelaar, P. Eline Slagboom, Marian Beekman, Joris Deelen, Diana van Heemst, Jan H. Veldink, Leonard H. van den Berg, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Aaron Isaacs, André G. Uitterlinden, P. Mila Jhamai, Michael Verbiest, H. Eka D. Suchiman, Marijn Verkerk, Ruud van der Breggen, Jeroen van Rooij, Nico Lakenberg, Hailiang Mei, Maarten van Iterson, Dasha V. Zhernakova, Peter van ’t Hof, Patrick Deelen, Peter A. C. ’t Hoen, Martijn Vermaat, René Luijk, Marc Jan Bonder, Freerk van Dijk, Wibowo Arindrarto, Szymon M. Kielbasa, Erik. W. van Zwet, Peter-Bram ’t Hoen, Joyce B. J. van Meurs, Peter A. C. ’t Hoen, M. Arfan Ikram, Marleen M. J. van Greevenbroek, Dorret I. Boomsma, P. Eline Slagboom, Jan H. Veldink, Erik W. van Zwet, Bastiaan T. Heijmans |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 8 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 47% |
| Scientists | 13 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,164,630
of 24,486,486 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#906
of 4,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,549
of 404,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#33
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,486,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.