The receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the result of an ancestral recombination between the bat-CoV RaTG13 and the pangolin-CoV MP789

@lotuna_ @past_is_future https://t.co/4fmimTfUsd https://t.co/dXVhsBsdyg https://t.co/k1bRbHAa2Z

Pangolin Papers: ck them out https://t.co/DqHoimIP5E https://t.co/kW3HQzuar3 https://t.co/2HXCF3msPl https://t.co/qsa64F9UIM https://t.co/Wf7RsidNYF https://t.co/vlFkoRcf2J https://t.co/VzFQmHs4qD https://t.co/HfSgssjvMV https://t.co/wvqoDvQurc ht

@DavidFosterLSP @Jarothz @alien_pool @ZacksJerryRig @elonmusk @StationCDRKelly Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 has traced essentially every aspect of the original strain to other coronaviruses, suggesting that it evolved through in-vivo recombination b

@Rossana38510044 @_everythingism @MicahGoldrich @Biol4Ever @humourme101 @stuartjdneil @scotub @jaredpretender @InWuchang @Graybea71861266 @Stephengm99 @FrancescoEsp33 @past_is_future @CD57227 You simply didn't know what you were talking about RaTG13, both

@JaEsf @Biorealism @Graybea71861266 @past_is_future @RicketRob @gdemaneuf @ydeigin @EntropyChase @kcz100 @MJnanostretch @dr_handler @BiophysicsFL @MonaRahalkar @ryangrim @Ayjchan @R_H_Ebright @USRightToKnow @mattwridley @JamieMetzl @zeynep @emilyakopp @jbl

@R_H_Ebright @past_is_future @stuartjdneil https://t.co/kSo6dDyfrY "Collectively, these data demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that RaTG13 is not the progenitor of SARS-CoV-2, with or without laboratory manipulation or experimental mutagenesis." https:/

@R_H_Ebright https://t.co/kSo6dDyfrY

@R_H_Ebright @past_is_future @stuartjdneil "The levels of genetic similarity between the 2019-nCoV and RaTG13 suggest that the latter does not provide the exact variant that caused the outbreak in humans" https://t.co/SvQ1sKmVWm https://t.co/InMgHo59Yz h

RT @AtomsksSanakan: 3/H An obvious problem: SARS-CoV-2 almost certainly did not come from RaTG13 (a.k.a. BtCov/4991), the mentioned corona…

3/H An obvious problem: SARS-CoV-2 almost certainly did not come from RaTG13 (a.k.a. BtCov/4991), the mentioned coronavirus from the mine. This has been known for at least a year. https://t.co/Y8ZVpIo7NI https://t.co/WiDkRW7U5w https://t.co/JENZzZnVae

@jfjulien @TheSeeker268 @past_is_future @stuartjdneil @_everythingism @krylormaximus @Maestermagoo @FrancescoEsp33 @breakfast_dogs @SylviaT71323726 @franciscodeasis @Rossana38510044 @InWuchang @evolving_string @Daoyu15 @zhihuachen @ydeigin @lab_leak @MonaR

@jfjulien @TheSeeker268 @past_is_future @stuartjdneil @_everythingism @krylormaximus @Maestermagoo @FrancescoEsp33 @breakfast_dogs @SylviaT71323726 @franciscodeasis @Rossana38510044 @InWuchang @evolving_string @Daoyu15 @zhihuachen @ydeigin @lab_leak @MonaR

@Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @Scinquisitor Another one: https://t.co/7Bs5TxADfP

@OscarMacLean1 @HumeField I had seen this paper.. Would like your views on this paper.. https://t.co/7Bs5TxADfP

@ydeigin @Scinquisitor @R_H_Ebright But here is another paper which claims SARS-CoV-2 RBD is the result of a recombination.. https://t.co/7Bs5TxADfP All in all, extremely weak arguments put forth..

@Scinquisitor @veryvirology But again with regards to the RBD of SARS-CoV-2, here is a paper which claims it was produced by recombination: https://t.co/7Bs5TxADfP

@pathogenetics @Daoyu15 @Scinquisitor The paper also claims the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 probably represents an ancestral non-recombination event.. But the below paper says otherwise: https://t.co/7Bs5TxADfP

@Scinquisitor Hope you have seen this paper on SARS-CoV-2 RBD.. https://t.co/7Bs5TxADfP

есть даже соответствующая статья, в которой эта гипотеза исследуется: https://t.co/HDtRBbAxkv

A study in #BMCResNotes suggests that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is the result of recombination events between bat and pangolin CoVs. https://t.co/xBx60jEjpE https://t.co/AFbyhOXnnh

The receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the result of an ancestral recombination between the bat-CoV RaTG13 and the pangolin-CoV MP789. https://t.co/V4bXvHdB6x