You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-36 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amy Cheung, Michelle Weir, Alain Mayhew, Nicole Kozloff, Kaitlyn Brown, Jeremy Grimshaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
Spain | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 111 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 18% |
Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 26% |
Unknown | 14 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 11% |
Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,125,934
of 24,754,593 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,299
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,715
of 155,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,754,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.