| Title |
Respiratory physiology of COVID-19-induced respiratory failure compared to ARDS of other etiologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03253-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Domenico Luca Grieco, Filippo Bongiovanni, Lu Chen, Luca S. Menga, Salvatore Lucio Cutuli, Gabriele Pintaudi, Simone Carelli, Teresa Michi, Flava Torrini, Gianmarco Lombardi, Gian Marco Anzellotti, Gennaro De Pascale, Andrea Urbani, Maria Grazia Bocci, Eloisa S. Tanzarella, Giuseppe Bello, Antonio M. Dell’Anna, Salvatore M. Maggiore, Laurent Brochard, Massimo Antonelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 13% |
| Mexico | 10 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Colombia | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 14% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 293 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 112 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 126 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#845,360
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#636
of 6,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,556
of 424,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.