↓ Skip to main content

Platelet-rich plasma therapy - future or trend?

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Platelet-rich plasma therapy - future or trend?
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/ar3914
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robinder S Dhillon, Edward M Schwarz, Michael D Maloney

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Chronic complex musculoskeletal injuries that are slow to heal pose challenges to physicians and researchers alike. Orthobiologics is a relatively newer science that involves application of naturally found materials from biological sources (for example, cell-based therapies), and offers exciting new possibilities to promote and accelerate bone and soft tissue healing. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an orthobiologic that has recently gained popularity as an adjuvant treatment for musculoskeletal injuries. It is a volume of fractionated plasma from the patient's own blood that contains platelet concentrate. The platelets contain alpha granules that are rich in several growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor-β, insulin-like growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor, which play key roles in tissue repair mechanisms. PRP has found application in diverse surgical fields to enhance bone and soft-tissue healing by placing supra-physiological concentrations of autologous platelets at the site of tissue damage. The relative ease of preparation, applicability in the clinical setting, favorable safety profile and possible beneficial outcome make PRP a promising therapeutic approach for future regenerative treatments. However, there is a large knowledge gap in our understanding of PRPs mechanism of action, which has raised skepticism regarding its potential efficacy and use. Thus, the aim of this review is to describe the various factors proposed to contribute to the biological activity of PRP, and the published pre-clinical and clinical evidence to support it. Additionally, we describe the current techniques and technology for PRP preparation, and review the present shortcomings of this therapy that will need to be overcome if it is to gain broad acceptance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 245 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Other 55 22%
Unknown 64 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Chemistry 6 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 74 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,019,039
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#82
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,514
of 184,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#4
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.