↓ Skip to main content

Translating research findings into practice – the implementation of kangaroo mother care in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Translating research findings into practice – the implementation of kangaroo mother care in Ghana
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Marie Bergh, Rhoda Manu, Karen Davy, Elise van Rooyen, Gloria Quansah Asare, J Koku Awoonor Williams, McDamien Dedzo, Akwasi Twumasi, Alexis Nang-beifubah

Abstract

Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is a safe and effective method of caring for low birth weight infants and is promoted for its potential to improve newborn survival. Many countries find it difficult to take KMC to scale in healthcare facilities providing newborn care. KMC Ghana was an initiative to scale up KMC in four regions in Ghana. Research findings from two outreach trials in South Africa informed the design of the initiative. Two key points of departure were to equip healthcare facilities that conduct deliveries with the necessary skills for KMC practice and to single out KMC for special attention instead of embedding it in other newborn care initiatives. This paper describes the contextualisation and practical application of previous research findings and the results of monitoring the progress of the implementation of KMC in Ghana.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 22%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Postgraduate 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 19%
Social Sciences 21 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,506,812
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,074
of 1,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,688
of 169,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#17
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.