↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR-Cas9 enrichment and long read sequencing for fine mapping in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CRISPR-Cas9 enrichment and long read sequencing for fine mapping in plants
Published in
Plant Methods, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13007-020-00661-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena López-Girona, Marcus W. Davy, Nick W. Albert, Elena Hilario, Maia E. M. Smart, Chris Kirk, Susan J. Thomson, David Chagné

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 32 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,104,926
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#457
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,349
of 399,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#17
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.