↓ Skip to main content

Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO telementoring program for the Namibian HIV workforce

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO telementoring program for the Namibian HIV workforce
Published in
Human Resources for Health, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12960-020-00503-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard Bikinesi, Gillian O’Bryan, Clay Roscoe, Tadesse Mekonen, Naemi Shoopala, Assegid T. Mengistu, Souleymane Sawadogo, Simon Agolory, Gram Mutandi, Valerie Garises, Rituparna Pati, Laura Tison, Ledor Igboh, Carla Johnson, Evelyn M. Rodriguez, Tedd Ellerbrock, Heather Menzies, Andrew L. Baughman, Laura Brandt, Norbert Forster, John Scott, Brian Wood, Kenton T. Unruh, Sanjeev Arora, Michelle Iandiorio, Summers Kalishman, Sarah Zalud-Cerrato, Jutta Lehmer, Stephen Lee, Mohammed A. Mahdi, Samantha Spedoske, Alexandra Zuber, Brigg Reilley, Christian B. Ramers, Ndapewa Hamunime, Gabrielle O’Malley, Bruce Struminger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 31 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 34 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,217,132
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#656
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,199
of 424,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.