You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO telementoring program for the Namibian HIV workforce
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12960-020-00503-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leonard Bikinesi, Gillian O’Bryan, Clay Roscoe, Tadesse Mekonen, Naemi Shoopala, Assegid T. Mengistu, Souleymane Sawadogo, Simon Agolory, Gram Mutandi, Valerie Garises, Rituparna Pati, Laura Tison, Ledor Igboh, Carla Johnson, Evelyn M. Rodriguez, Tedd Ellerbrock, Heather Menzies, Andrew L. Baughman, Laura Brandt, Norbert Forster, John Scott, Brian Wood, Kenton T. Unruh, Sanjeev Arora, Michelle Iandiorio, Summers Kalishman, Sarah Zalud-Cerrato, Jutta Lehmer, Stephen Lee, Mohammed A. Mahdi, Samantha Spedoske, Alexandra Zuber, Brigg Reilley, Christian B. Ramers, Ndapewa Hamunime, Gabrielle O’Malley, Bruce Struminger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
United States | 2 | 22% |
Namibia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,217,132
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#656
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,199
of 424,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.