You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01094-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gehad Mohamed Tawfik, Hoang Thi Nam Giang, Sherief Ghozy, Ahmed M. Altibi, Hend Kandil, Huu-Hoai Le, Peter Samuel Eid, Ibrahim Radwan, Omar Mohamed Makram, Tong Thi Thu Hien, Mahmoud Sherif, As-Saba Hossain, Tai Luu Lam Thang, Livia Puljak, Hosni Salem, Tarek Numair, Kazuhiko Moji, Nguyen Tien Huy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,895,842
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#263
of 2,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,641
of 401,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.