You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The ongoing impacts of hepatitis c - a systematic narrative review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-672 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emma R Miller, Stephen McNally, Jack Wallace, Marisa Schlichthorst |
Abstract |
Many countries have developed, or are developing, national strategies aimed at reducing the harms associated with hepatitis C infection. Making these strategies relevant to the vast majority of those affected by hepatitis C requires a more complete understanding of the short and longer term impacts of infection. We used a systematic approach to scope the literature to determine what is currently known about the health and psychosocial impacts of hepatitis C along the trajectory from exposure to ongoing chronic infection, and to identify what knowledge gaps remain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Thailand | 1 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 17% |
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
Psychology | 9 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,669,787
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,035
of 15,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,910
of 170,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#53
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.