↓ Skip to main content

Circulating bilirubin levels and risk of colorectal cancer: serological and Mendelian randomization analyses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

1 news outlet
31 tweeters
1 Facebook page


16 Dimensions

Readers on

30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Circulating bilirubin levels and risk of colorectal cancer: serological and Mendelian randomization analyses
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01703-w
Pubmed ID

Nazlisadat Seyed Khoei, Mazda Jenab, Neil Murphy, Barbara L. Banbury, Robert Carreras-Torres, Vivian Viallon, Tilman Kühn, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Krasimira Aleksandrova, Amanda J. Cross, Elisabete Weiderpass, Magdalena Stepien, Andrew Bulmer, Anne Tjønneland, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Gianluca Severi, Franck Carbonnel, Verena Katzke, Heiner Boeing, Manuela M. Bergmann, Antonia Trichopoulou, Anna Karakatsani, Georgia Martimianaki, Domenico Palli, Giovanna Tagliabue, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Guri Skeie, Susana Merino, Catalina Bonet, Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco, Leire Gil, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Eva Ardanaz, Robin Myte, Johan Hultdin, Aurora Perez-Cornago, Dagfinn Aune, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Demetrius Albanes, John A. Baron, Sonja I. Berndt, Stéphane Bézieau, Hermann Brenner, Peter T. Campbell, Graham Casey, Andrew T. Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Michelle Cotterchio, Steven Gallinger, Stephen B. Gruber, Robert W. Haile, Jochen Hampe, Michael Hoffmeister, John L. Hopper, Li Hsu, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Mark A. Jenkins, Amit D. Joshi, Ellen Kampman, Susanna C. Larsson, Loic Le Marchand, Christopher I. Li, Li, Annika Lindblom, Noralane M. Lindor, Vicente Martín, Victor Moreno, Polly A. Newcomb, Kenneth Offit, Shuji Ogino, Patrick S. Parfrey, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Gad Rennert, Lori C. Sakoda, Clemens Schafmayer, Stephanie L. Schmit, Robert E. Schoen, Martha L. Slattery, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Franzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Korbinian Weigl, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Emily White, Alicja Wolk, Michael O. Woods, Anna H. Wu, Xuehong Zhang, Pietro Ferrari, Gabriele Anton, Annette Peters, Ulrike Peters, Marc J. Gunter, Karl-Heinz Wagner, Heinz Freisling

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 12 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2022.
All research outputs
of 21,173,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
of 3,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 316,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,173,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them