↓ Skip to main content

Relevance of the type III error in epidemiological maps

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relevance of the type III error in epidemiological maps
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-11-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald Heinzl, Thomas Waldhoer

Abstract

A type III error arises from a two-sided test, when one side is erroneously favoured although the true effect actually resides on the other side. The relevance of this grave error in decision-making is studied for epidemiological maps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2012.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#374
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,643
of 186,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.