You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Behcet’s disease in budd-chiari syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-014-0153-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne Claire Desbois, Pierre Emmanuel Rautou, Lucie Biard, Nadia Belmatoug, Bertrand Wechsler, Mathieu Resche-Rigon, Virginie Zarrouk, Bruno Fantin, M Pineton de Chambrun, Patrice Cacoub, Dominique Valla, David Saadoun, Aurélie Plessier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 18% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 55% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,330
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#570
of 2,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,782
of 245,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.