You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing prioritization strategies for delivering indoor residual spray (IRS) implementation, using a network approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03398-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sadie J. Ryan, Anne C. Martin, Bhavneet Walia, Anna Winters, David A. Larsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 33% |
| Zambia | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,971,434
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#697
of 5,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,170
of 399,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#15
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.