↓ Skip to main content

Towards harmonization of microscopy methods for malaria clinical research studies

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards harmonization of microscopy methods for malaria clinical research studies
Published in
Malaria Journal, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03352-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehul Dhorda, El Hadji Ba, J. Kevin Baird, John Barnwell, David Bell, Jane Y. Carter, Arjen Dondorp, Lenny Ekawati, Michelle Gatton, Iveth González, Philippe J. Guérin, Sandra Incardona, Ken Lilley, Didier Menard, François Nosten, Peter Obare, Bernhards Ogutu, Piero L. Olliaro, Ric N. Price, Stéphane Proux, Andrew R. Ramsay, John C. Reeder, Kamolrat Silamut, Cheikh Sokhna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 37 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 37 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,078,183
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#706
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,179
of 403,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#14
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.