Title |
How do I steer this thing? Using dendritic cell targeted vaccination to more effectively guide the antitumor immune response with combination immunotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40425-016-0135-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefanie N. Linch, William L. Redmond |
Abstract |
Mounting an immune response sufficient to eradicate a tumor is the goal of modern immunotherapy. Single agent therapies with checkpoint inhibitors or costimulatory molecule agonists are effective only for a small portion of all treated patients. Combined therapy, e.g., CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint blockade, is a more effective treatment modality, but in preclinical studies OX40 agonism with CTLA-4 blockade using monoclonal antibodies (aOX40/aCTLA-4) failed to induce tumor regression of larger, more established tumors. We hypothesized that administration of a vaccine with a tumor-associated antigen targeted to the appropriate antigen presenting cell could make combined aOX40/aCTLA-4 therapy more effective. We administered an antibody-based vaccine targeting HER2 to the DEC-205 endocytic receptor on cross-presenting dendritic cells (anti-DEC-205/HER2; aDEC-205/HER2) and a potent adjuvant (poly (I:C)) to assist with maturation, along with aOX40/aCTLA-4 therapy. This therapy induced complete regression of established tumors and a pronounced infiltration of effector CD8 and CD4 T cells, with no effect on regulatory T cell infiltration compared to aOX40/aCTLA-4 alone. To be maximally effective, this therapy required expression of both OX40 and CTLA-4 on CD8 T cells. These data indicate that vaccination targeting cross-presenting dendritic cells with a tumor-associated antigen is a highly effective immunization strategy that can overcome some of the limitations of current systemic immunotherapeutic approaches that lack defined tumor-directed antigenic targets. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 25% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |