You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Estimation of menstrual blood loss volume based on menstrual diary and laboratory data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Women's Health, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-12-24 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ulrike Schumacher, Jens Schumacher, Uwe Mellinger, Christoph Gerlinger, Andreas Wienke, Jan Endrikat |
Abstract |
Abnormal uterine bleeding is often investigated in clinical studies and critical to identify during gynecological consultation. The current standard for quantification of menstrual blood loss is the alkaline-hematin-method. However, this method is expensive and inconvenient for patients. Bleeding diaries, although widely used, provide only qualitative information on menstrual blood loss. Other methods have been developed, but still do not provide reliable quantitative data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 26% |
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
Engineering | 5 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2012.
All research outputs
#19,171,898
of 23,758,334 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,651
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,244
of 170,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,758,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.