You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How to design a pre-specified statistical analysis approach to limit p-hacking in clinical trials: the Pre-SPEC framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01706-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brennan C. Kahan, Gordon Forbes, Suzie Cro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 30% |
United States | 5 | 14% |
Denmark | 3 | 8% |
Belgium | 3 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 5% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 51% |
Scientists | 12 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 33% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 12% |
Mathematics | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 27% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,918,975
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,347
of 3,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,501
of 408,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#36
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.