| Title |
Decision-making for receiving paid home care for dementia in the time of COVID-19: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-020-01719-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clarissa Giebel, Kerry Hanna, Jacqueline Cannon, Ruth Eley, Hilary Tetlow, Anna Gaughan, Aravind Komuravelli, Justine Shenton, Carol Rogers, Sarah Butchard, Steve Callaghan, Stan Limbert, Manoj Rajagopal, Kym Ward, Lisa Shaw, Rosie Whittington, Mishca Hughes, Mark Gabbay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 58 | 49% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 47 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 17% |
| Scientists | 18 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 61 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#369,229
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#32
of 3,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,228
of 426,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#2
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.