You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of hydration status on cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial T1 and T2 relaxation time assessment: an intraindividual study in healthy subjects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00661-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julian A. Luetkens, Marilia Voigt, Anton Faron, Alexander Isaak, Narine Mesropyan, Darius Dabir, Alois M. Sprinkart, Claus C. Pieper, Johannes Chang, Ulrike Attenberger, Daniel Kuetting, Daniel Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
El Salvador | 1 | 10% |
Russia | 1 | 10% |
Germany | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 44% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,425,754
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#373
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,901
of 427,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.