| Title |
Treatment estimands in clinical trials of patients hospitalised for COVID-19: ensuring trials ask the right questions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01737-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brennan C. Kahan, Tim P. Morris, Ian R. White, Conor D. Tweed, Suzie Cro, Darren Dahly, Tra My Pham, Hanif Esmail, Abdel Babiker, James R. Carpenter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 71% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 25% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 30% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,555,490
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,098
of 3,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,116
of 407,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.