You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guiametabolica.org: empowerment through internet tools in inherited metabolic diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-7-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Armayones, M Antònia Vilaseca, Júlia Cutillas, Jordi Fàbrega, Jorge Juan Fernández, Mei García, Natàlia Egea, Modesta Pousada, Beni Gómez-Zuñiga, Jaume Pérez-Payarols, Rafael Artuch, Francesc Palau, Mercedes Serrano |
| Abstract |
Web-based interventions are effective on the patient empowerment. Guiametabolica.org constitutes an interface for people involved in inherited metabolic diseases, trying to facilitate access to information and contact with professionals and other patients, offering a platform to develop support groups. Guiametabolica.org is widely considered for Spanish-speaking patients and caregivers with inherited metabolic diseases. Preliminary evaluations show changes in their habits, decrease in their senses of isolation and improvement regarding self-efficacy. Specific inherited metabolic diseases websites, especially participative websites, should be considered as a complement to more traditional clinical approaches. Their contribution lies in patient's general well-being, without interfering with traditional care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 20% |
| Librarian | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 23% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2012.
All research outputs
#4,630,994
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#615
of 2,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,459
of 169,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.