↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Use of medical face masks versus particulate respirators as a component of personal protective equipment for health care workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Use of medical face masks versus particulate respirators as a component of personal protective equipment for health care workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13756-020-00810-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Conly, W. H. Seto, Didier Pittet, Alison Holmes, May Chu, Paul R. Hunter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Engineering 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#11,329,644
of 19,001,205 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
#718
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,233
of 311,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,001,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them