↓ Skip to main content

Nanoparticle treatment of maize analyzed through the metatranscriptome: compromised nitrogen cycling, possible phytopathogen selection, and plant hormesis

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanoparticle treatment of maize analyzed through the metatranscriptome: compromised nitrogen cycling, possible phytopathogen selection, and plant hormesis
Published in
Microbiome, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40168-020-00904-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wouter M. A. Sillen, Sofie Thijs, Gennaro Roberto Abbamondi, Roberto De La Torre Roche, Nele Weyens, Jason C. White, Jaco Vangronsveld

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 24%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Engineering 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#12,976,550
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,339
of 1,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,511
of 401,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#35
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.