You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using video-cases to assess student reflection: Development and validation of an instrument
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-12-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastiaan Koole, Tim Dornan, Leen Aper, Bram De Wever, Albert Scherpbier, Martin Valcke, Janke Cohen-Schotanus, Anselme Derese |
Abstract |
Reflection is a meta-cognitive process, characterized by: 1. Awareness of self and the situation; 2. Critical analysis and understanding of both self and the situation; 3. Development of new perspectives to inform future actions. Assessors can only access reflections indirectly through learners' verbal and/or written expressions. Being privy to the situation that triggered reflection could place reflective materials into context. Video-cases make that possible and, coupled with a scoring rubric, offer a reliable way of assessing reflection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 119 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
Researcher | 14 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
Professor | 10 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 45 | 36% |
Unknown | 15 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 32 | 26% |
Psychology | 11 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,820,431
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,838
of 3,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,039
of 162,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.