↓ Skip to main content

Using video-cases to assess student reflection: Development and validation of an instrument

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using video-cases to assess student reflection: Development and validation of an instrument
Published in
BMC Medical Education, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastiaan Koole, Tim Dornan, Leen Aper, Bram De Wever, Albert Scherpbier, Martin Valcke, Janke Cohen-Schotanus, Anselme Derese

Abstract

Reflection is a meta-cognitive process, characterized by: 1. Awareness of self and the situation; 2. Critical analysis and understanding of both self and the situation; 3. Development of new perspectives to inform future actions. Assessors can only access reflections indirectly through learners' verbal and/or written expressions. Being privy to the situation that triggered reflection could place reflective materials into context. Video-cases make that possible and, coupled with a scoring rubric, offer a reliable way of assessing reflection.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Vietnam 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Lecturer 10 8%
Professor 10 8%
Other 48 39%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 31%
Social Sciences 32 26%
Psychology 11 9%
Computer Science 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 17 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2012.
All research outputs
#11,028,898
of 12,409,138 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,629
of 1,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,980
of 125,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#23
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,409,138 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.