You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intensity modulated radiotherapy in early stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients: Is it better than three dimensional conformal radiotherapy?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiation Oncology, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-7-129 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vitaliana De Sanctis, Chiara Bolzan, Marco D’Arienzo, Stefano Bracci, Alessandro Fanelli, Maria Christina Cox, Maurizio Valeriani, Mattia F Osti, Giuseppe Minniti, Laura Chiacchiararelli, Riccardo Maurizi Enrici |
Abstract |
Cure rate of early Hodgkin Lymphoma are high and avoidance of late toxicities is of paramount importance. This comparative study aims to assess the normal tissue sparing capability of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus standard three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for different organs at risk in supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 12% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,531,683
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#209
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,436
of 165,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.