You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Regulatory inspection of registered private drug shops in East-Central Uganda—what it is versus what it should be: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40545-020-00265-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arthur Bagonza, Stefan Peterson, Andreas Mårtensson, Henry Wamani, Phyllis Awor, Milton Mutto, David Musoke, Linda Gibson, Freddy Eric Kitutu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Pakistan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 21% |
Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,766,781
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#243
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,048
of 401,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.